That offers knowledge to the community, that can then be built on by others. Other people doing similar things are willing to contribute to the community by describing in detail the algorithm, and even providing source code software to demonstrate it. If you can build a reputation, you'll probably try to make a bit of money out of it, but aside from the usefulness of the program itself in the short term, it doesn't offer so much to the community. So that means it is useful for future developments to be based on it and people to learn, but in your case it is just a piece of software that will be available for a little while. One thing that warp-sharp has that you don't have is a description of the algorithm and the source code. When you are claiming it is some all-new 'invention', you should be prepared to support such a claim. simply a related algorithm in this area, which should be useful for comparison. Again I'm not claiming that warp-sharp is better or easier to use. Well, actually I see 2 sliders in picture cooler. 'Refocus works completely different the Pixels around sharping edges are moved toward the sharping edges In a different Dimension-direction'. He subject header is the same, just with the 'part 2' addedĪgain my Algorithm is different I do no warping. I have made a new thread because the text tor

If I created a windows/profiles/something/something/ directory to match the ones it was using, then I could get it to create its files and be happy to run. Since then I worked with it a bit, and found that it was because it was expecting a particular directory to exist. That I can make a special version for you (to test). I have all ready give you a answer yesterday in the other thread

Warpsharp for windows